Monday, December 18, 2006

Time Magazine Person of the Year


Time magazine announced their annual "Person of the Year" and it's you. That's right. You are the person of the year. The cover on the physical magazine (yes - I don't just read blogs) even has a mirror on it so when you look at it you see yourself. Of course, if you are just reading blogs and not writing your own, then they are really talking about me and not you (so start writing!). To be factually accurate (a raison d’ĂȘtre* of DigitalEdu) it's not a mirror but a piece of reflective mylar that creates a rather disturbingly distorted image of one's face. Frankly, it's a bit of a hoot to see myself move from a pinhead (magazine in a convex shape) to a multi-headed monster (slightly concave).

The editors at Time have recognized the fairly dramatic change that has taken place on the Internet in the last couple of years as the web has shifted from a producer/consumer model of information flow to a more participatory architecture. It has been dubbed Web 2.0 and blogs, wikis and RSS are emerging from the geek ghetto into the mainstream of American culture. It is shifting the national dialogue away from the powerful elite toward - well - toward anyone who has an opinion and doesn't mind sharing it. Evidently, that is a whole lot of people. According to my favorite blog search/index site, Technorati, every day about 100,000 new blogs are created and 1.3 million new blog postings are created. That's a lot of dialogue.

The timing of this article in Time is perfect because in January I'm speaking during our faculty in-service on this very issue. I'm doing a presentation called "Geek Report: Web 2.0" at the Chancellor's In-Service session and then at each campus I'm doing a session called "Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Blogging - But Were Afraid to Ask". I've been working on the presentations the last few days and I was beginning to worry that the topics might be a bit on the geeky side. Now, thanks to Time - I'm mainstream USA!

* Look it up

No comments: